How to Train a Model for Pharmacological Relation Extraction

Sep 10, 2024 | Educational

In this article, we will explore how to train a model that recognizes four types of relationships between significant pharmacological entities in Russian-language reviews. This process involves inputting review texts and identifying the relationships based on entity pairs. Let’s dive into the specifics.

Understanding the Model

The proposed model is trained to identify the following relationships from a given subset of reviews:

  • ADR–Drugname: The relationship between a drug and its side effects.
  • Drugname–Diseasename: The relationship between a drug and a disease.
  • Drugname–SourceInfoDrug: The relationship between the medication and the source of information (e.g., recommendations).
  • Diseasename–Indication: The connection between a disease and its symptoms.

Data and Model Training

The model leverages a subset of 908 reviews from the Russian Drug Review Corpus (RDRS). This subset contains pairs of entities marked with the aforementioned relationship types, including non-relationships as well.

For analogy, think of this process as a guide dog learning to navigate obstacles. Just as the guide dog receives training from various scenarios and learns to identify paths and blockages, our model learns from labeled reviews to recognize the types of relationships it must find in the text.

Model Topology and Training Process

The foundation of this model is based on the XLM-RoBERTA-large architecture. Initially, the model undergoes additional training as a language model on a corpus of unmarked drug reviews. Following this, it is fine-tuned as a classification model using 80% of the texts from our selected subset.

How to Use the Model

For step-by-step instructions on using the model, refer to the How to Use section in our GitHub repository. The instructions will guide you through the setup, input formatting, and how to run the model effectively.

Results

Once trained, the model demonstrated impressive accuracy, confirmed through the F1 score metric across the different relationship types:

Relationship Type F1 Score
ADR–Drugname 0.955
Drugname–Diseasename 0.892
Drugname–SourceInfoDrug 0.922
Diseasename–Indication 0.891

Troubleshooting Tips

While implementing your model, you might encounter a few hiccups. Here are some troubleshooting suggestions:

  • Ensure that your environment has all the necessary libraries installed. Missing libraries can lead to import errors.
  • Verify your input format against the model requirements. The model is sensitive to formatting issues.
  • If the accuracy isn’t as expected, consider reevaluating your training dataset or adjusting model parameters.

For more insights, updates, or to collaborate on AI development projects, stay connected with fxis.ai.

Conclusion

At fxis.ai, we believe that such advancements are crucial for the future of AI, as they enable more comprehensive and effective solutions. Our team is continually exploring new methodologies to push the envelope in artificial intelligence, ensuring that our clients benefit from the latest technological innovations.

Stay Informed with the Newest F(x) Insights and Blogs

Tech News and Blog Highlights, Straight to Your Inbox